[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: define-inlinable
From: |
Andreas Rottmann |
Subject: |
Re: define-inlinable |
Date: |
Tue, 12 Apr 2011 00:11:55 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Andy Wingo <address@hidden> writes:
> Heya :)
>
> On Mon 11 Apr 2011 22:01, address@hidden (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
>
>>> I don't know if this is important, as R6RS users probably have lots of
>>> other carnage to deal with, but it is strictly an ABI break.
>>
>> Well well, they’ll need to recompile. My feeling is that it’s
>> acceptable, but I don’t have a strong opinion.
>
> In this case it probably is, but we don't really know what users there
> are. But let's please keep this general issue in mind in the future.
>
Agreed. I'm reluctant to using macros as a performance hack (e.g.,
define-inlinable) -- it just feels wrong, but sometimes performance
numbers are seductive...
Regards, Rotty
--
Andreas Rottmann -- <http://rotty.yi.org/>
- [PATCH 2/3] Several optimizations for R6RS fixnum arithmetic, (continued)
- [PATCH 2/3] Several optimizations for R6RS fixnum arithmetic, Andreas Rottmann, 2011/04/02
- [PATCH 3/3] Add `fixnum?' VM primitive, Andreas Rottmann, 2011/04/02
- Re: [PATCH 3/3] Add `fixnum?' VM primitive, Andy Wingo, 2011/04/04
- Re: [PATCH 3/3] Add `fixnum?' VM primitive, Andreas Rottmann, 2011/04/04
- define-inlinable, Ludovic Courtès, 2011/04/06
- Re: define-inlinable, Andreas Rottmann, 2011/04/06
- Re: define-inlinable, Ludovic Courtès, 2011/04/06
- Re: define-inlinable, Andy Wingo, 2011/04/11
- Re: define-inlinable, Ludovic Courtès, 2011/04/11
- Re: define-inlinable, Andy Wingo, 2011/04/11
- Re: define-inlinable,
Andreas Rottmann <=
- Re: [PATCH 3/3] Add `fixnum?' VM primitive, Ludovic Courtès, 2011/04/07