[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: (define-module (foo) #:import (...)), a la r6rs
From: |
Jose A. Ortega Ruiz |
Subject: |
Re: (define-module (foo) #:import (...)), a la r6rs |
Date: |
Thu, 28 Jul 2011 23:52:03 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (darwin) |
On Thu, Jul 28 2011, Andy Wingo wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I was hacking on Dorodango today, in a script that happened to have a
> Guile-style (define-module ...) block, and I was importing pieces of an
> rnrs library. Then I needed to update the import set to provide what
> was needed. In the middle of making a keyboard macro to add
> #:use-module before the library names, I realized that `library' is
> actually a lot better in this regard, in that you just have one `import'
> block, and all the libraries are listed there without having a prefix on
> each one.
>
> So what do you all think about:
>
> (define-module (foo)
> #:import ((bar)
> (only (baz) qux foo)
> ...))
>
> Or even:
>
> (define-module (foo)
> (import (bar)
> (only (baz) qux foo)
> ...))
fwiw, i like the second form better (looks more schemish to me), and i agree
both forms are an improvement over #:use-module.
jao
--
I don't necessarily agree with everything I say.
-Marshall McLuhan (1911-1980)