Re: bytevector -- was: Guile: What's wrong with this?

[Bruce Korb]

Hi,

On 01/03/12 19:12, Noah Lavine wrote:
> > Then it turned out that the string functions would now clear the
> > high order bit on strings, so they are no longer byte arrays and
> > there is no replacement but to roll my own.  I stopped supporting
> > byte arrays.  A noticable nuisance.
>
> This is just a side note to the main discussion, but there is now a
> 'bytevector' datatype you can use. Does that work for you? If not,
> what functionality is missing?
>
> Thanks,

Oh, no, thank _you_!  That is likely what I need.  I don't track
Guile development closely.  I have GUILE_WARN_DEPRECATED set to
"detailed" and expect that to warn me when issues are coming up.
It has actually yet to do so, however.  Imagine my surprise.

Cheers - Bruce