[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH] Colorized REPL
From: |
Nala Ginrut |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH] Colorized REPL |
Date: |
Sun, 09 Dec 2012 18:44:45 +0800 |
On Sun, 2012-12-09 at 08:50 +0800, Daniel Hartwig wrote:
> On 9 December 2012 05:35, Ian Price <address@hidden> wrote:
> > Or, you could use the package manager I keep pimping :)
>
> Yes indeed, it works quite well. As does just adding such files to a
> site- or user-local module path.
>
> > (os process) might be reasonable, since we are forever complaining about
> > the popen module, but I don't see why we need (ansi term-color).
>
> Yes, agree. It is best to avoid adding some extra fluff (such as ansi
> color module, colored output, etc.) to the core when appropriate.
> Feature creep and all that is not a big win, makes guile generally
> /less/ embeddable, and such.
>
(ice-9 colorized) has already had the useful part compatible with (ansi
term-color), you may checkout 'upstream' branch. So we don't have to add
(ansi term-color).
@ijp: yeah~what's the status about guildhall? Is there an official
release? And the main site for it?
Re: [PATCH] Colorized REPL, Daniel Llorens, 2012/12/05