[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Adding new information to scm_t_port (was Re: always O_BINARY?)
From: |
Andy Wingo |
Subject: |
Re: Adding new information to scm_t_port (was Re: always O_BINARY?) |
Date: |
Thu, 28 Feb 2013 09:53:54 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.2 (gnu/linux) |
On Thu 28 Feb 2013 04:24, Mark H Weaver <address@hidden> writes:
> Instead of having 'input_cd' and 'output_cd' point directly to the
> platform's iconv_t structures, let's have them point to our own internal
> structure(s) that hold the needed transcoder state. This could include
> things like the state for internally-implement encoding(s) (e.g. UTF-8
> BOM handling), EOL style, and iconv_t pointer(s) if appropriate.
Great idea.
I would call it a generic "port-private" data structure; it is not
limited to transcoder state.
struct scm_t_port_private;
#define SCM_I_PORT_PRIVATE ((struct scm_t_port_private*)((ptob)->input_cd))
MHO :)
Andy
--
http://wingolog.org/