Re: [PATCH] Improve handling of Unicode byte-order marks (BOMs)

[Mike Gran]

Hi Mark



>>>  Here's the new patch.  Any more suggestions?

There are a couple of lines in your doc patch that aren't quite right.

"@code{UTF-16BE}, @code{UTF-16LE}, @code{UTF-16BE}, or @code{UTF-16LE}"

I assume that two of these should be UTF-32.

Also

"This is intended to multiple logical text streams embedded
within a larger binary stream.""

Should probably be be

"This is intended to support multiple ..."

-Mike