[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH] Bindings for ‘sendfile’
From: |
Thien-Thi Nguyen |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH] Bindings for ‘sendfile’ |
Date: |
Thu, 18 Apr 2013 08:58:37 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.2 (gnu/linux) |
() address@hidden (Ludovic Courtès)
() Wed, 17 Apr 2013 18:27:04 +0200
So that was over a PF_INET/SOCK_STREAM socket, right?
Yes. FWIW, "ttn-do sizzweb" can also operate over PF_UNIX/SOCK_STREAM
and i recall doing some testing (w/ similar results) there.
Would it occur systematically, or just once in a while?
Sorry, i can't recall precisely. My vague memory is that on the client
(apt-get) side, i saw some packages download completely, no problem,
about 20% of the time. I suppose it would be good to collect some hard
data, draw graphs, tweak kernel knobs, publish papers, etc. Some day...
--
Thien-Thi Nguyen
GPG key: 4C807502
pgpuFmJLQTbhF.pgp
Description: PGP signature
- Re: [PATCH] Bindings for ‘sendfile’, (continued)
- Re: [PATCH] Bindings for ‘sendfile’, Thien-Thi Nguyen, 2013/04/09
- Re: [PATCH] Bindings for ‘sendfile’, Ludovic Courtès, 2013/04/09
- Re: [PATCH] Bindings for ‘sendfile’, Thien-Thi Nguyen, 2013/04/09
- Re: [PATCH] Bindings for ‘sendfile’, Mark H Weaver, 2013/04/10
- Re: [PATCH] Bindings for ‘sendfile’, Thien-Thi Nguyen, 2013/04/14
- Re: [PATCH] Bindings for ‘sendfile’, Ludovic Courtès, 2013/04/16
- Re: [PATCH] Bindings for ‘sendfile’, Thien-Thi Nguyen, 2013/04/16
- Re: [PATCH] Bindings for ‘sendfile’, Ludovic Courtès, 2013/04/17
- Re: [PATCH] Bindings for ‘sendfile’, Thien-Thi Nguyen, 2013/04/17
- Re: [PATCH] Bindings for ‘sendfile’, Ludovic Courtès, 2013/04/17
- Re: [PATCH] Bindings for ‘sendfile’,
Thien-Thi Nguyen <=
- Re: [PATCH] Bindings for ‘sendfile’, Ludovic Courtès, 2013/04/10
- Re: [PATCH] Bindings for ‘sendfile’, Thien-Thi Nguyen, 2013/04/14
Re: [PATCH] Bindings for ‘sendfile’, Ludovic Courtès, 2013/04/07