[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: boehm-gc troubles with 2.0.11 on NetBSD/i386
From: |
Mark H Weaver |
Subject: |
Re: boehm-gc troubles with 2.0.11 on NetBSD/i386 |
Date: |
Tue, 22 Apr 2014 12:14:48 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) |
Greg Troxel <address@hidden> writes:
> I am curious if others are having success on other *BSD, and which
> versions and architectures.
zacts on #guile has done work on a guile 2.0.11 package for FreeBSD
ports, and based on his reports it seems to work well. IIRC, he built
it (and boehm-gc) with threads enabled (pthreads). There was just one
notable issue: guile needs a patch (see attached) for clang 3.4 on
32-bit systems. I haven't yet pushed this to git because it needs to be
made more portable. Anyway, I doubt it's related to the problem you're
seeing.
Mark
diff --git a/libguile/foreign.c b/libguile/foreign.c
index 01af900..59f5e72 100644
--- a/libguile/foreign.c
+++ b/libguile/foreign.c
@@ -814,7 +814,7 @@ SCM_DEFINE (scm_pointer_to_procedure, "pointer->procedure",
3, 0, 0,
static const struct
{
- scm_t_uint64 dummy; /* ensure 8-byte alignment; perhaps there's a better way
*/
+ SCM_ALIGNED (8) scm_t_uint64 dummy; /* alignment */
const scm_t_uint8 bytes[10 * (sizeof (struct scm_objcode) + 8
+ sizeof (struct scm_objcode) + 32)];
} raw_bytecode = {
@@ -867,7 +867,7 @@ make_objcode_trampoline (unsigned int nargs)
static const struct
{
- scm_t_uint64 dummy; /* alignment */
+ SCM_ALIGNED (8) scm_t_uint64 dummy; /* alignment */
scm_t_cell cells[10 * 2]; /* 10 double cells */
} objcode_cells = {
0,
diff --git a/libguile/gsubr.c b/libguile/gsubr.c
index b6f261f..38b7ce1 100644
--- a/libguile/gsubr.c
+++ b/libguile/gsubr.c
@@ -213,7 +213,7 @@
*/
static const struct
{
- scm_t_uint64 dummy; /* ensure 8-byte alignment; perhaps there's a better way
*/
+ SCM_ALIGNED (8) scm_t_uint64 dummy; /* alignment */
const scm_t_uint8 bytes[121 * (sizeof (struct scm_objcode) + 16
+ sizeof (struct scm_objcode) + 32)];
} raw_bytecode = {
@@ -317,7 +317,7 @@ static const struct
static const struct
{
- scm_t_uint64 dummy; /* alignment */
+ SCM_ALIGNED (8) scm_t_uint64 dummy; /* alignment */
scm_t_cell cells[121 * 2]; /* 11*11 double cells */
} objcode_cells = {
0,
- boehm-gc troubles with 2.0.10 on NetBSD/i386, Greg Troxel, 2014/04/11
- Re: boehm-gc troubles with 2.0.10 on NetBSD/i386, Mark H Weaver, 2014/04/11
- Re: boehm-gc troubles with 2.0.10 on NetBSD/i386, Greg Troxel, 2014/04/11
- Re: boehm-gc troubles with 2.0.10 on NetBSD/i386, Mark H Weaver, 2014/04/11
- Re: boehm-gc troubles with 2.0.10 on NetBSD/i386, Greg Troxel, 2014/04/11
- Re: boehm-gc troubles with 2.0.10 on NetBSD/i386, Mark H Weaver, 2014/04/11
- Re: boehm-gc troubles with 2.0.11 on NetBSD/i386, Greg Troxel, 2014/04/22
- Re: boehm-gc troubles with 2.0.11 on NetBSD/i386, Taylan Ulrich Bayirli/Kammer, 2014/04/22
- Re: boehm-gc troubles with 2.0.11 on NetBSD/i386,
Mark H Weaver <=
- Re: boehm-gc troubles with 2.0.10 on NetBSD/i386, Ludovic Courtès, 2014/04/12
- Re: boehm-gc troubles with 2.0.10 on NetBSD/i386, Mark H Weaver, 2014/04/12
- Re: boehm-gc troubles with 2.0.10 on NetBSD/i386, Greg Troxel, 2014/04/12
Re: boehm-gc troubles with 2.0.10 on NetBSD/i386, Ludovic Courtès, 2014/04/12