[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: What is needed in guildhall to include it in Guile?
From: |
Christopher Allan Webber |
Subject: |
Re: What is needed in guildhall to include it in Guile? |
Date: |
Mon, 22 Feb 2016 10:17:02 -0800 |
User-agent: |
mu4e 0.9.13; emacs 24.5.1 |
Arne Babenhauserheide writes:
> Hi,
>
> In january there was a thread here about Guildhall with the notion
>
>> I encourage you to hack on Guildhall to make it more usable for your
>> needs.
>
> I finished my PhD last month, so I have some freed-up time — and I would
> like to use some of it to hack on Guildhall and make it ready for
> inclusion in Guile.
>
> However there’s one stumbling block: I don’t see what’s actually missing
> from it. So I want to be bold and request something:
>
>
> Please tell me what’s missing in Guildhall, so I can implement it.
>
>
> Best wishes,
> Arne
>
> [1]: https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guile-devel/2016-01/msg00010.html
>
> PS: I write now, because I just stumbled over a situation again, where
> I’d have loved to just have guildhall at hand by default. I wanted
> to test uptop.scm which needs guile-ssh, so I just wanted to quickly
> get guile-ssh and run the script. Yes, guix can do that. But the
> guix daemons weren’t running.
I've never run it so it's hard for me to know. The "obvious" idea might
be to get a Guix package of Guildhall so more of us might play with it? ;)