[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: guile 3 desires: guile-3-0, and debugging
From: |
Matt Wette |
Subject: |
Re: guile 3 desires: guile-3-0, and debugging |
Date: |
Fri, 24 Nov 2017 16:50:45 -0800 |
> On Nov 24, 2017, at 3:42 PM, Christopher Allan Webber <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> Matt Wette writes:
>
>> Here are a couple desires:
>>
>> 1) more cases for cond-expand, in case 3.2 has items 3.0 does not (e.g.,
>> srfi-199)
>>
>> 2) better debugging.
>> Maybe I'm not doing it right, but I struggle in this area: I mostly resort
>> to printing.
>> For example, add scheme level hook, or command arg, to turn off
>> optimization.
>
> You aren't alone... read this thread:
>
> https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guile-user/2017-05/msg00068.html
>
> And Andy's suggestion of what we need to do to make it better:
>
> https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guile-user/2017-05/msg00070.html
(set! (@@ (language tree-il optimize) tree-il-default-optimization-options)
(lambda () '()))
and maybe this also?
(set! (@@ (language cps optimize) cps-default-optimization-options) (lambda ()
'()))