[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: How to configure/make guile gtk?
From: |
Roland Orre |
Subject: |
Re: How to configure/make guile gtk? |
Date: |
Sat, 19 Jun 2004 23:40:36 +0200 (CEST) |
User-agent: |
SquirrelMail/1.4.2 |
I made the guile-1.7 paths (include, exe) globally visible and then it
worked fine. There were a few minor compiler warnings also which I
corrected. This is wonderful! It also works fine to run with threads
so I can run the top-repl in parallell. What I installed was
guile-gtk-1.2 but I noticed that you mentioned 0.19. I'm not sure
I understand the difference.
Will the things I develop with this gtk also be runnable in MS windows
and Mac OS environments? (OK, I myself am only using Linux but it is
nice to be able to make platform independent GUIs)
/Roland
> It looks like the includedir stuff isn't getting passed to the snarf
> command. Does make -k show the rest compiling? Try bashing
> Makefile.in to include the extra includes on the snarf commands, rerun
> config.status and try again.
>
> I made myself a distfile from current cvs of guile-gtk, and made a
> netbsd pkgsrc entry, and that builds fine. 0.19 is a bit crufty, and
> people are threatening to make a release.
>
> (IMHO it would be good to just make a release without worrying about
> whether it is 100% ok, and pick up the pieces, than continue as we
> are. I have a tarfile called guile-gtk-0.23.tar.gz that I made from
> CVS, and it builds and runs on netbsd with guile 1.6.4. I should
> have done 'make dist', but didn't - I just tarred up from CVS after
> running ./autogen.sh. I just ran a make dist, and and the resulting
> tarball is pretty similar, and tagged 0.40-beta1.)
>
> It would be nice to use the gnu standard version numbers, and call
> that 0.39.90, so numeric sort works. Or perhaps 0.40.90 to not break
> those who sort on beta1 already, heading towards 0.41.
>
>
> --
> Greg Troxel <address@hidden>
>