[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: guile-gtk
From: |
Jan Nieuwenhuizen |
Subject: |
Re: guile-gtk |
Date: |
Mon, 21 Jun 2004 17:57:27 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.1003 (Gnus v5.10.3) Emacs/21.3 (gnu/linux) |
Andreas Rottmann writes:
> I've some talking with Rob Browning about that; I've taken over
> maintainership of G-Wrap and will release a 1.9.0 pretty soon
> now. I'll then package the new G-Wrap for Debian (which will coexist
> with the old g-wrap packages).
Great, this is very good news!
> I think after we have a G-Wrap 1.9.0 release, we can release tarballs
> of Guile-GNOME soonish.
> As soon as we have tarballs out (and g-wrap 1.9 is packaged), I can
> go ahead and work to close the now already long-standing ITP on
> guile-gobject.
And this!
> As Guile CVS seems to be a bit fucked up ATM, this might be a reason;
> It used to work.
Ok. We'll just `wait' for Dirk Herrman do fix CVS.
> I think testing and new code using the bindings would be nice. Other
> than that, I can't think of something ATM.
Ok, then I'll keep doing what I'm doing (which is just that).
Greetings,
Jan.
--
Jan Nieuwenhuizen <address@hidden> | GNU LilyPond - The music typesetter
http://www.xs4all.nl/~jantien | http://www.lilypond.org
- Re: guile-gtk, Andreas Rottmann, 2004/06/20
- Re: guile-gtk,
Jan Nieuwenhuizen <=