[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: 2.7.90 released
From: |
Andy Wingo |
Subject: |
Re: 2.7.90 released |
Date: |
Wed, 10 Nov 2004 22:40:20 +0200 |
Hi Greg,
If you're still interested in this, maybe you can take a look at making
a patch. The (gnome gobject) modules are fixed, but g-wrap needs help to
load the lib from the right path. Look at g-wrap/guile.scm in the g-wrap
distro -- it will need hacking, and some interface need changing to
allow a destination-dir argument to be passed around.
Of course, Rotty is the g-wrap maintainer, so you should talk to him.
Regards,
Wingo.
On Sat, 2004-10-16 at 19:07 -0400, Greg Troxel wrote:
> I should also say thank you to Andreas, who has been helping me both
> on and off list.
>
> Earlier I wrote:
>
> gdt 708 ~ > LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/y0/lib guile
> guile> (use-modules (gnome gobject))
>
> In my view, a package that needs to load its own files at runtime, of
> whatever sort, should look for them in the prefix with which it was
> configured. Without LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/y0/lib, I get
>
> guile> (use-modules (gnome gobject))
> /usr/pkg/share/guile/gnome/gobject/gtype.scm:102:15: In procedure
> dynamic-link in expression (dynamic-link "libguile-gnome-gobject"):
> /usr/pkg/share/guile/gnome/gobject/gtype.scm:102:15: file:
> "libguile-gnome-gobject", message: "can't open the module"
> ABORT: (misc-error)
>
> Type "(backtrace)" to get more information or "(debug)" to enter the
> debugger.
> guile>
>
> If the dynamic-link had called (string-append (gobject-prefix) "/lib/"
> "libguile-gnome-gobject") instead, I think this would have worked out
> fine:
>
> guile> (dynamic-link (string-append "/usr/y0/lib/"
> "libguile-gnome-gobject"))
> #<dynamic-object "/usr/y0/lib/libguile-gnome-gobject">
>
> I realize this is a semi-religious issue, as it would seem that
> Debian's objection to -rpath would apply here as well. I don't
> understand the anti---rpath argument, but this is different in that
> the prefix is only used for hte file in question, and isn't part of a
> search path. But I suppose this could be a configure-time option, so
> that both camps could have it installed as they like it.
>
> Thoughts?
>
>
--
Andy Wingo <address@hidden>
http://ambient.2y.net/wingo/
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- Re: 2.7.90 released,
Andy Wingo <=