Re: [Fwd: guile-1.7.x and load-extension]

[Rob Browning]

Marius Vollmer <address@hidden> writes:

> Nooo!  It's the other way around: load-extension is the new thing, and
> you should use it in preference to a dynamic-link/dynamic-call combo.
> However, dynamic-link and dynamic-call are not deprecated since they
> are useful on its own.
>
> Apparently some docs about this are confusing.  Can you say where you
> learned that load-extension is deprecated?

My bad memory perhaps?  :>

What's the thing that preceeded load-extension then?  You and I had a
discussion a while back about it, and about how the default
assumptions it was making were causing trouble, and that's when you
changed things -- I think perhaps I'm remembering
scm_register_module...

-- 
Rob Browning
rlb @defaultvalue.org, @linuxdevel.com, and @debian.org
Previously @cs.utexas.edu
GPG=1C58 8B2C FB5E 3F64 EA5C  64AE 78FE E5FE F0CB A0AD