[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: guile-doc-snarf replaced in the Makefile for scwm
From: |
Marius Vollmer |
Subject: |
Re: guile-doc-snarf replaced in the Makefile for scwm |
Date: |
10 Sep 2002 21:10:43 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2 |
P Pareit <address@hidden> writes:
> The documentation says to use guile-snarf to generate the .x files
> that gets included in the initializing functions.
That is correct.
> For the .c.doc rule I was suggested to use guile-tools c2doc, but my
> installation did not include c2doc and I also did not find
> documentation for it. And the rule does not get used so I throw it
> out.
So Scwm doesn't make any use of .doc files?
> I also think it is not needed to remove the generated files if
> guile-snarf fails as guile-snarf will do when given file to output ,
> so I could even change this to:
The "-o OUTPUT" option needs to come before the input file, like so:
.c.x:
guile-snarf -o $@ $< $(DEFS) $(INCLUDES) $(CPPFLAGS) $(CFLAGS)
.cc.x:
guile-snarf -o $@ $< $(DEFS) $(INCLUDES) $(CPPFLAGS) $(CFLAGS)
This variant will work with both 1.6.0 and the unofficial 1.4.x
series, I think. Putting "$<" at the very end will only work with
1.6.0 (I think).
> If someone could confirm I'm right? This way I can start changing
> autogen.sh for scwm and send in a patch.
>From the Guile point of view, you are right. When Scwm needs the .doc
files, we need to find a solution for that as well. (We need to find
a solution anyway and probably "c2doc" is it.)
--
GPG: D5D4E405 - 2F9B BCCC 8527 692A 04E3 331E FAF8 226A D5D4 E405