[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Stupid module and pregexp questions
From: |
tomas |
Subject: |
Re: Stupid module and pregexp questions |
Date: |
Wed, 30 Apr 2003 12:34:45 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.3i |
On Wed, Apr 30, 2003 at 02:58:25AM -0400, Thien-Thi Nguyen wrote:
> From: address@hidden
> Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2003 08:48:40 +0200
>
> - Do you think that it's viable to build Rx into Guile? What about
> the licenses (as Guile is now LGPL)?
>
> see http://www.glug.org/alt/guile-1.4.1.93.tar.gz (1.4.2 precursor).
> included are the (lang *) scheme modules that make use of Rx. back
> "ports" from hackerlab Rx welcome.
Uh, oh. What I'd like to see would be a `standard' regexp interface
for Scheme (and may be a `standard' regexp implementation for Guile).
This would boost all those portable programs which nowadays try to
parse strange things the hard way.
Regards
-- tomas
- Re: Low level things in C or Scheme [was Stupid module and pregexp questions], (continued)
- Re: Stupid module and pregexp questions, Robert Uhl, 2003/04/28
- Re: Stupid module and pregexp questions, MJ Ray, 2003/04/29
- Re: Stupid module and pregexp questions, Tom Lord, 2003/04/29
- Re: Stupid module and pregexp questions, Ken Anderson, 2003/04/29
- Re: Stupid module and pregexp questions, tomas, 2003/04/30
- Re: Stupid module and pregexp questions, Tom Lord, 2003/04/30
- Re: Stupid module and pregexp questions, Tom Lord, 2003/04/30
- Re: Stupid module and pregexp questions, Thien-Thi Nguyen, 2003/04/30
- Re: Stupid module and pregexp questions,
tomas <=
- Re: Stupid module and pregexp questions, Tom Lord, 2003/04/30
- Re: Stupid module and pregexp questions, Robert Uhl, 2003/04/30