[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: PATCH: assume -s
From: |
Thien-Thi Nguyen |
Subject: |
Re: PATCH: assume -s |
Date: |
Fri, 29 Aug 2003 06:38:23 -0400 |
From: Aaron VanDevender <address@hidden>
Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2003 09:32:29 -0400
you can say
guile foo.scm
instead of
guile -s foo.scm
cool.
[patch]
this implementation duplicates code in the "-s" handling case. while
understandable (given the intent of the change), i'd like to request
another patch that is more immune to future code skew. could you rework
it so that both the "-s" and the non-recognized case use the same code?
thi
- PATCH: assume -s, Aaron VanDevender, 2003/08/28
- Re: PATCH: assume -s,
Thien-Thi Nguyen <=
- Re: PATCH: assume -s, Aaron VanDevender, 2003/08/29
- Re: PATCH: assume -s, Neil Jerram, 2003/08/30
- Re: PATCH: assume -s, Neil Jerram, 2003/08/30
- Re: PATCH: assume -s, Marius Vollmer, 2003/08/31
- Re: PATCH: assume -s, Neil Jerram, 2003/08/31