[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Leap second bug?
From: |
Ondrej Zajicek |
Subject: |
Leap second bug? |
Date: |
Sat, 7 Jun 2008 22:40:54 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) |
Hello
I found this:
(use-modules (srfi srfi-19))
(define (str->date str) (string->date str "~d-~m-~Y"))
(define (date->str str) (date->string str "~d-~m-~Y"))
(date->str (time-utc->date (date->time-utc (str->date "01-01-2006"))))
-> "31-12-2005"
Is is a bug in leap second handling or is it a expected behavior?
--
Elen sila lumenn' omentielvo
Ondrej 'SanTiago' Zajicek (email: address@hidden)
OpenPGP encrypted e-mails preferred (KeyID 0x11DEADC3, wwwkeys.pgp.net)
"To err is human -- to blame it on a computer is even more so."
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
- Leap second bug?,
Ondrej Zajicek <=