[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Guile base64
From: |
Andy Wingo |
Subject: |
Re: Guile base64 |
Date: |
Mon, 06 Sep 2010 11:59:15 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux) |
Hi,
On Sun 05 Sep 2010 23:58, Thien-Thi Nguyen <address@hidden> writes:
> () Romel Sandoval <address@hidden>
> () Fri, 03 Sep 2010 15:15:58 -0500
>
> Do you think any of mentioned implementations should be
> included with Guile 2.0 or it's better to keep it apart?
>
> Probably next week (2010-09-13 onward) i can find some time to add
> (ice-9 base64) from Guile 1.4.x
Cool!
Perhaps we could combine interfaces -- the stream-based (I presume; I
haven't seen your code yet, but I know your Scheme code looks good)
interfaces from yours, and the map-3-to-4 stuff from Andreas' R6RS port
of my base64.scm.
I say this because the r6rs port already uses bytevectors, and compiles
down to fairly tight VM code. I haven't run benchmarks though.
Cheers,
Andy
--
http://wingolog.org/
- Guile base64, Romel Sandoval, 2010/09/01
- Re: Guile base64, Ludovic Courtès, 2010/09/02
- Re: Guile base64, Andy Wingo, 2010/09/02
- Re: Guile base64, Andreas Rottmann, 2010/09/02
- Re: Guile base64, Romel Sandoval, 2010/09/03
- Re: Guile base64, Thien-Thi Nguyen, 2010/09/05
- Re: Guile base64, Ludovic Courtès, 2010/09/05
- Re: Guile base64, Thien-Thi Nguyen, 2010/09/06
- Re: Guile base64,
Andy Wingo <=
- Re: Guile base64, Thien-Thi Nguyen, 2010/09/28