[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: progv in scheme
From: |
Andrew Gwozdziewycz |
Subject: |
Re: progv in scheme |
Date: |
Thu, 15 Sep 2011 14:16:48 -0400 |
That's exactly what I was thinking, Kernel that is. But, I didn't
wanna sound like an idiot saying, "if only we had FExprs"...
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 2:11 PM, Andy Wingo <address@hidden> wrote:
> On Tue 13 Sep 2011 12:09, "Bill Schottstaedt" <address@hidden> writes:
>
>> if lambda were applicable, this would work in both cases:
>>
>> (define-macro (progv vars vals . body)
>> `(apply (apply lambda ,vars ',body) ,vals))
>
> That's fun! Makes me think of Kernel. I think you'd enjoy Kernel,
> Bill, if you haven't seen it already.
>
> http://fexpr.blogspot.com/2011/04/fexpr.html
>
> Andy
> --
> http://wingolog.org/
>
>
--
http://www.apgwoz.com
- Re: progv in scheme, (continued)
Re: progv in scheme, Ian Price, 2011/09/13