[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Lilypond speed (was Re: How to make GNU Guile more successful)
From: |
Ludovic Courtès |
Subject: |
Re: Lilypond speed (was Re: How to make GNU Guile more successful) |
Date: |
Thu, 09 Mar 2017 13:13:33 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1 (gnu/linux) |
Hello,
Thomas Morley <address@hidden> skribis:
> Btw, I've improved my local setup to be able to test lilypond more
> quickly with different guile versions. Though I wasn't able to compile
> 1.8.8, neither from the repository nor from the tarball downloaded
> from
> https://www.gnu.org/software/guile/download/
> Due to:
> async.c: In function 'scm_i_queue_async_cell':
> async.c:243:14: error: variable 'count' set but not used
> [-Werror=unused-but-set-variable]
> size_t count;
> ^
>
> Am I missing something?
Could you try configuring like this:
./configure --disable-error-on-warning
?
> I'm aware noone is interested in developing 1.8.8 further, though I
> would have prefered to build lilypond with that version as well, like
> the other test-versions.
The performance gap in LilyPond between 1.8 and 2.0 is terrible. I
suppose LilyPond uses ‘eval’ to run Scheme code? What fraction of the
Scheme code being run for this benchmark is pre-compiled (as a .go
file)? Is auto-compilation enabled, and could it be that the figures
include auto-compilation time?
Thanks,
Ludo’.
- Re: How to make GNU Guile more successful, (continued)
- Re: How to make GNU Guile more successful, Arne Babenhauserheide, 2017/03/04
- Re: How to make GNU Guile more successful, Thomas Morley, 2017/03/04
- Re: How to make GNU Guile more successful, Thomas Morley, 2017/03/05
- Re: How to make GNU Guile more successful, David Kastrup, 2017/03/05
- Re: How to make GNU Guile more successful, Thomas Morley, 2017/03/05
- Re: How to make GNU Guile more successful, Thomas Morley, 2017/03/05
- Lilypond speed (was Re: How to make GNU Guile more successful), Andy Wingo, 2017/03/06
- Re: Lilypond speed (was Re: How to make GNU Guile more successful), Thomas Morley, 2017/03/08
- Re: Lilypond speed (was Re: How to make GNU Guile more successful), David Kastrup, 2017/03/08
- Re: Lilypond speed (was Re: How to make GNU Guile more successful), Thien-Thi Nguyen, 2017/03/09
- Re: Lilypond speed (was Re: How to make GNU Guile more successful),
Ludovic Courtès <=
- Re: Lilypond speed (was Re: How to make GNU Guile more successful), Paul, 2017/03/09
- Re: Lilypond speed (was Re: How to make GNU Guile more successful), Ludovic Courtès, 2017/03/10
- Re: Lilypond speed (was Re: How to make GNU Guile more successful), Paul, 2017/03/10
- Re: Lilypond speed (was Re: How to make GNU Guile more successful), Thomas Morley, 2017/03/12
- Re: Lilypond speed (was Re: How to make GNU Guile more successful), Ludovic Courtès, 2017/03/12
- Re: Lilypond speed (was Re: How to make GNU Guile more successful), Matt Wette, 2017/03/12
- Re: Lilypond speed (was Re: How to make GNU Guile more successful), Andy Wingo, 2017/03/13
- Controlling optimizations in 2.2, Ludovic Courtès, 2017/03/13
- Re: Controlling optimizations in 2.2, Andy Wingo, 2017/03/13
- Re: How to make GNU Guile more successful, Matt Wette, 2017/03/03