[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
01/04: refresh: Report packages using the "@" syntax.
From: |
Ludovic Courtès |
Subject: |
01/04: refresh: Report packages using the "@" syntax. |
Date: |
Mon, 1 May 2017 11:31:05 -0400 (EDT) |
civodul pushed a commit to branch master
in repository guix.
commit 6d1a5e5ffdbb7d15ffad7918213d96ee8c6e9164
Author: Ludovic Courtès <address@hidden>
Date: Mon May 1 15:51:47 2017 +0200
refresh: Report packages using the "@" syntax.
* guix/scripts/refresh.scm (list-dependents)[full-name]: New procedure.
Use 'full-name' instead of 'package-full-name'.
* doc/guix.texi (Invoking guix refresh): Adjust example accordingly.
---
doc/guix.texi | 2 +-
guix/scripts/refresh.scm | 12 ++++++++----
2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/doc/guix.texi b/doc/guix.texi
index 957ce2b..9f63413 100644
--- a/doc/guix.texi
+++ b/doc/guix.texi
@@ -5852,7 +5852,7 @@ an upgrade. More rebuilds might be required under some
circumstances.
@example
$ guix refresh --list-dependent flex
Building the following 120 packages would ensure 213 dependent packages are
rebuilt:
-hop-2.4.0 geiser-0.4 notmuch-0.18 mu-0.9.9.5 cflow-1.4 idutils-4.6 @dots{}
+hop@@2.4.0 geiser@@0.4 notmuch@@0.18 mu@@0.9.9.5 cflow@@1.4 idutils@@4.6
@dots{}
@end example
The command above lists a set of packages that could be built to check
diff --git a/guix/scripts/refresh.scm b/guix/scripts/refresh.scm
index 4d3c695..c0d589a 100644
--- a/guix/scripts/refresh.scm
+++ b/guix/scripts/refresh.scm
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
;;; GNU Guix --- Functional package management for GNU
-;;; Copyright © 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016 Ludovic Courtès <address@hidden>
+;;; Copyright © 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017 Ludovic Courtès <address@hidden>
;;; Copyright © 2013 Nikita Karetnikov <address@hidden>
;;; Copyright © 2014 Eric Bavier <address@hidden>
;;; Copyright © 2015 Alex Kost <address@hidden>
@@ -315,6 +315,10 @@ WARN? is true and no updater exists for PACKAGE, print a
warning."
"List all the things that would need to be rebuilt if PACKAGES are changed."
;; Using %BAG-NODE-TYPE is more accurate than using %PACKAGE-NODE-TYPE
;; because it includes implicit dependencies.
+ (define (full-name package)
+ (string-append (package-name package) "@"
+ (package-version package)))
+
(mlet %store-monad ((edges (node-back-edges %bag-node-type
(all-packages))))
(let* ((dependents (node-transitive-edges packages edges))
@@ -327,12 +331,12 @@ WARN? is true and no updater exists for PACKAGE, print a
warning."
(N_ "No dependents other than itself: ~{~a~}~%"
"No dependents other than themselves: ~{~a~^ ~}~%"
(length packages))
- (map package-full-name packages)))
+ (map full-name packages)))
((x)
(format (current-output-port)
(_ "A single dependent package: ~a~%")
- (package-full-name x)))
+ (full-name x)))
(lst
(format (current-output-port)
(N_ "Building the following package would ensure ~d \
@@ -341,7 +345,7 @@ dependent packages are rebuilt: ~*~{~a~^ ~}~%"
dependent packages are rebuilt: ~{~a~^ ~}~%"
(length covering))
(length covering) (length dependents)
- (map package-full-name covering))))
+ (map full-name covering))))
(return #t))))