[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Agreeing on some "rules" for packaging.
|
From: |
Andreas Enge |
|
Subject: |
Re: Agreeing on some "rules" for packaging. |
|
Date: |
Sat, 7 Sep 2013 10:36:14 +0200 |
|
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
On Sat, Sep 07, 2013 at 12:20:23PM +0400, Nikita Karetnikov wrote:
> make distclean && ./boostrap && ./configure && make && make check
> before pushing, or will it be too tedious?
Would "make" not be enough? Usually there is a warning message when there
is a problem.
> Also, I don’t like the ‘license:’ prefix. What about something like
> ‘l:’? It’ll probably be even better to use ‘#:select’ when it’s
> possible.
Personally, I would do things the other way round and always use a prefix...
Then I can simply write down the license of a package without checking
whether it is already selected in the module.
Andreas