guix-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: guix pull (error)


From: Ludovic Courtès
Subject: Re: guix pull (error)
Date: Sat, 12 Oct 2013 21:31:12 +0200
User-agent: Gnus/5.130007 (Ma Gnus v0.7) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux)

Jeffrin Jose <address@hidden> skribis:

> -------------------cut-x-here-------------
> $guix pull
> starting download of `guix-file.5G1sMw' from 
> `http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git/snapshot/guix-master.tar.gz'...
> http://git.savannah.gnu.org/.../guix-master.tar.gz    4185.0 KiB transferred
> The following derivation will be built:
>    /nix/store/1v3ykijky3d6gq7gvnvdwkc66wq68n4c-guix-latest.drv
> The following files will be downloaded:
>    /nix/store/iwyl3m0n7nzh4pl0rp0n4a6n4vm7ppwp-tar-1.26
>    /nix/store/w0wcbwwr6q8zfkwf1fiifdyiyif48zic-gzip-1.6
>    /nix/store/8bnpcr53gwkc31gg3gsi1d7hlygqrjqj-libgcrypt-1.5.3
>    /nix/store/q0szrvcs5bkk6ikij8qjpd56hn1z8c8k-module-import
>    /nix/store/xx9qw71zd5wwqmbr0ls4mrjlj3w8wqk7-module-import-compiled
>    /nix/store/ldxf5wvk7dh5d95msg7bs8fsnawxmj3h-libgpg-error-1.12
>    /nix/store/vmsk3gwg3z9ra7rzyg34892da1dp72ap-grep-2.14
> guix pull: error: build failed: build of 
> `/nix/store/1v3ykijky3d6gq7gvnvdwkc66wq68n4c-guix-latest.drv' failed

I can reproduce the bug.  Running ‘guix pull --verbose’ to get the build
log shows this:

--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
compiling 
'/nix/store/wjzi8xyya4y7yn6nbvnfci2akjn1i91j-guix-latest/gnu/packages.scm'...
compiling 
'/nix/store/wjzi8xyya4y7yn6nbvnfci2akjn1i91j-guix-latest/gnu/packages/acct.scm'...
compiling 
'/nix/store/wjzi8xyya4y7yn6nbvnfci2akjn1i91j-guix-latest/gnu/packages/acl.scm'...
compiling 
'/nix/store/wjzi8xyya4y7yn6nbvnfci2akjn1i91j-guix-latest/gnu/packages/algebra.scm'...
Backtrace:
In ice-9/psyntax.scm:
 270: 19 [scan ((#(syntax-object let # ...) (#) (# #) ...)) () ...]
In ice-9/eval.scm:
 411: 18 [eval # ()]
In ice-9/boot-9.scm:
2870: 17 [define-module* (gnu packages algebra) #:filename ...]
2845: 16 [resolve-imports ((#) (#) (#) (#) ...)]
2783: 15 [resolve-interface (gnu packages flex) #:select ...]
2708: 14 [#<procedure 212df40 at ice-9/boot-9.scm:2696:4 (name #:optional 
autoload version #:key ensure)> # ...]
2981: 13 [try-module-autoload (gnu packages flex) #f]
2320: 12 [save-module-excursion #<procedure 334cc60 at ice-9/boot-9.scm:2982:17 
()>]
3001: 11 [#<procedure 334cc60 at ice-9/boot-9.scm:2982:17 ()>]
In unknown file:
   ?: 10 [primitive-load-path "gnu/packages/flex" ...]
In ice-9/eval.scm:
 453: 9 [eval # ()]
 432: 8 [eval # #]
 436: 7 [eval # #]
 432: 6 [eval # #]
 436: 5 [eval # #]
 387: 4 [eval # #]
 386: 3 [eval # #]
 393: 2 [eval # #]
In unknown file:
   ?: 1 [memoize-variable-access! #<memoized search-patch> #<directory # 
32d4360>]
In ice-9/boot-9.scm:
 106: 0 [#<procedure 40186c0 at ice-9/boot-9.scm:97:6 (thrown-k . args)> 
unbound-variable ...]

ice-9/boot-9.scm:106:20: In procedure #<procedure 40186c0 at 
ice-9/boot-9.scm:97:6 (thrown-k . args)>:
ice-9/boot-9.scm:106:20: Unbound variable: search-patch
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---

This is no good.  I’m currently investigating and will report back.

Thanks,
Ludo’.



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]