guix-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH 1/6] gnu: gobject-introspection: look for 'gcc' when no compi


From: Ludovic Courtès
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] gnu: gobject-introspection: look for 'gcc' when no compiler seems available.
Date: Sat, 30 Nov 2013 22:59:40 +0100
User-agent: Gnus/5.130007 (Ma Gnus v0.7) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux)

Hello!

Thanks for looking into this!

Cyril Roelandt <address@hidden> skribis:

> @@ -192,8 +193,8 @@ dynamic loading, and an object system.")
>           'configure
>           (lambda* (#:key #:allow-other-keys #:rest args)
>            (let ((configure (assoc-ref %standard-phases 'configure)))
> -           ;; giscanner/sourcescanner.py looks for 'CC', let's set it here.
> -           (setenv "CC" "gcc")
> +           (substitute* "giscanner/sourcescanner.py"
> +             (("GUIX_GCC_PATH") (which "gcc")))
>             (apply configure args)))
>           %standard-phases)))
>      (home-page "https://wiki.gnome.org/GObjectIntrospection";)
> diff --git a/gnu/packages/patches/gobject-introspection-cc.patch 
> b/gnu/packages/patches/gobject-introspection-cc.patch
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..280c5d3
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/gnu/packages/patches/gobject-introspection-cc.patch
> @@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
> +Try $CC, 'cc', and finally 'gcc'.
> +--- a/giscanner/sourcescanner.py.orig        2013-10-16 03:41:25.381719000 
> +0200
> ++++ b/giscanner/sourcescanner.py     2013-10-16 03:43:35.533719000 +0200
> +@@ -277,6 +277,11 @@
> +         defines = ['__GI_SCANNER__']
> +         undefs = []
> +         cpp_args = os.environ.get('CC', 'cc').split()  # support CC="ccache 
> gcc"
> ++        if (cpp_args == ['cc'] and
> ++            not any(map(lambda x: os.access(os.path.join(x, 'cc'), os.X_OK),
> ++                        os.environ.get('PATH')))):
> ++            cpp_args = ['GUIX_GCC_PATH']

Wouldn’t it work to just do:

  (substitute* "giscanner/sourcescanner.py"
    (("'cc'") (which "gcc")))

That way the patch wouldn’t even be needed.

WDYT?

Ludo’.



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]