guix-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH 0/4]: Add various audio libraries


From: Ludovic Courtès
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4]: Add various audio libraries
Date: Sun, 01 Feb 2015 22:18:23 +0100
User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.4 (gnu/linux)

Ricardo Wurmus <address@hidden> skribis:

> From dbc3bd203e311c75ca7f81a7f115eb2f516dd493 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: rekado <address@hidden>
         ^^^
(Make sure this is the intended name.)

> Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2015 10:00:56 +0100
> Subject: [PATCH 1/4] gnu: Add JACK2.
>
> * gnu/packages/audio.scm (jack-2): New variable.

LGTM.

> From ac7e1b8aa764d33d0a87e6ebb86c4e7498110f86 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: rekado <address@hidden>
> Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2015 10:08:53 +0100
> Subject: [PATCH 2/4] gnu: Add aubio.
>
> * gnu/packages/audio.scm (aubio): New variable.

[...]

> +    (description
> +     "aubio is a tool designed for the extraction of annotations from audio
> +signals.  Its features include segmenting a sound file before each of its
> +attacks, performing pitch detection, tapping the beat and producing midi

s/midi/MIDI/

OK!

> From c9515e8491cfb3b60b054637ab097aa21a044e63 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: rekado <address@hidden>
> Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2015 10:10:53 +0100
> Subject: [PATCH 3/4] gnu: Add liblo.
>
> * gnu/packages/audio.scm (liblo): New variable.

OK.

> From 3bb3b7346f44f8e4849efc7a5fc8b465a974d625 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: rekado <address@hidden>
> Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2015 10:12:00 +0100
> Subject: [PATCH 4/4] gnu: Add LV2.
>
> * gnu/packages/audio.scm (lv2): New variable.

[...]

> +    (synopsis "LV2 audio plugin standard")
> +    (description
> +     "LV2 is an open standard for audio plugins and host applications.  At 
> its
> +core, LV2 is a simple stable interface, accompanied by extensions which add
> +functionality to support the needs of increasingly powerful audio software.")

It’s not clear to me what this all means; I guess LV2 is not a
“standard” as in RFC or ISO, because it’s software.  That said, I don’t
have any suggestions, so I’ll leave it up to your creativity.  :-)

Otherwise looks OK.

Thanks,
Ludo’.



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]