[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Guix binary tarball
|
From: |
Andreas Enge |
|
Subject: |
Re: Guix binary tarball |
|
Date: |
Wed, 20 May 2015 10:10:16 +0200 |
|
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) |
On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 07:03:57PM -0400, Mark H Weaver wrote:
> If we did this, then we could revert 8c3a5d7059 and avoid any use of
> --skip-old-files. I would be in favor of this.
>
> What do you think?
Sounds good, thanks for looking into this!
Andreas
- Re: Guix binary tarball, (continued)
Re: Guix binary tarball, Andreas Enge, 2015/05/16
Re: Guix binary tarball, Ludovic Courtès, 2015/05/17
Re: Guix binary tarball, Mark H Weaver, 2015/05/19