Re: 01/01: gnu: dbus-glib: Propagate inputs dbus and glib.

[Andreas Enge]

On Sun, May 24, 2015 at 10:33:05AM -0400, Mark H Weaver wrote:
> address@hidden (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
> > Should we revert that part of the commit, at least for packages for
> > which we don’t know?
> FWIW, I don't feel the need to revert, especially since it would entail
> more rebuilding, but in the future I would prefer to use the more
> conservative approach that you outlined above.

Okay, both are fine with me.

> I don't think we should spend a lot of time on this, but to the extent
> we are aware of which inputs are directly needed by a given package, I
> think we should aim to include all directly used inputs, as opposed to
> aiming to remove inputs whenever they are propagated by something else.

Also okay then. It also saves quite some time...

Andreas