Re: Questions and Notes regarding Offloading and Substitutes

[Ludovic Courtès]

Carlos Sosa <address@hidden> skribis:

> address@hidden (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
>
>>
>> I must say that the fact that lsh was not mentioned was originally
>> intentional, on the grounds that the implementation would “soon” switch
>> to Guile-SSH instead (which is compatible with OpenSSH, not lsh.)  But
>> that hasn’t happened yet, although there’s a branch, wip-guile-ssh.
>
>   Oh I did see that branch in Savannah. Do you think I can try out
>   `wip-guile-ssh`? Is it in a working condition? Just like with these
>   topic I will give you my feedback :)

First you would need to rebase it on top of master.  It probably won’t
work out of the box, but I would certainly appreciate feedback and
patches!  :-)

I believe it requires the latest Guile-SSH.  Previous versions lacked
important features IIRC.

Thanks,
Ludo’.