Re: [PATCH] doc: Merge 'HACKING' into Texinfo manual.

[Ludovic Courtès]

Mathieu Lirzin <address@hidden> skribis:

> do 'HACKING' copyright notices need to be added to the manual too?

Yes, please.  (We may have to compress the copyright lines eventually
for the PS/PDF output.)

> From ccbbddb5d5335b3714a4e6204498f1fc24dca6ab Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Mathieu Lirzin <address@hidden>
> Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2015 00:08:43 +0200
> Subject: [PATCH] doc: Merge 'HACKING' into Texinfo manual.
>
> * HACKING: Delete file.
>   (Building from Git, The Perfect Setup, Coding Style, Submitting Patches):
>   Move to ...
> * doc/guix.texi (Running Guix Before It Is Installed): Likewise.
>   (Contributing): ... here.
> * README (Installation): Adapt to it.
> * configure.ac (DOT): Likewise.
> * Makefile.am (EXTRA_DIST): Likewise.

LGTM, but it removes a bit too much: The “Commit Access” section
vanished.  Could you leave ‘HACKING’ with that section and a sentence
telling users to look at the “Contributing” section of the manual?

> +Please write commit logs in the ChangeLog format (@pxref{Change Logs,,,
> +Standards, GNU Coding Standards}); you can check the commit history for
   ^
Should be lowercase “standards” (the name of the Info file.)

> +examples.
> +
> +Before submitting a patch that adds or modifies a package definition,
> +please run @code{guix lint @var{package}}, where @var{package} is the
> +name of the new or modified package, and fix any errors it reports.  In
                                                                     ^
Add: (@pxref{Invoking guix lint}).

> +addition, please make sure the package builds on your platform, using
> address@hidden build @var{package}}.  You may also want to check that
> +dependent package (if applicable) are not affected by the change;
> address@hidden refresh --list-dependent @var{package}} will help you do
> +that.
       ^
Add: (@pxref{Invoking guix refresh}).

Could you send an updated patch?

Thanks for working on it!

Ludo’.