Re: [PATCH] Add Non Sequencer.

[Ludovic Courtès]

Ricardo Wurmus <address@hidden> skribis:

>> Ricardo Wurmus <address@hidden> skribis:
>>
>>> From 57265b8363add56ea0ea2f35310c39db7e2b14ed Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>>> From: Ricardo Wurmus <address@hidden>
>>> Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2015 08:46:44 +0200
>>> Subject: [PATCH 1/2] gnu: Add NTK.
>>>
>>> * gnu/packages/fltk.scm (ntk): New variable.
>>
>> [...]
>>
>>> +    (license lgpl2.0)))
>>
>> Version 2.0-only?
>
> I copied this from “fltk” because it’s a fork and the author wrote that
> the license is the same as for “fltk”.  Now looking at the copyright
> headers I see the “or later” clause repeatedly.  Does this mean that the
> license for our “fltk” package is incorrect?  Should it not also be
> “lgpl2.0+” then?

If one or more files lack the “or later” clause, then that’s v2.0-only.
Otherwise there’s indeed a mistake.

Thanks for checking,
Ludo’.