[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
gpl3 vs. gpl3+
From: |
Alex Kost |
Subject: |
gpl3 vs. gpl3+ |
Date: |
Sun, 26 Jul 2015 13:18:00 +0300 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux) |
I see that only several packages uses 'gpl3' license. And I don't
really understand the cases when it should be used instead of 'gpl3+'.
I looked at "aarddict" and "weechat". They have the same
COPYING/LICENSE files as <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl.txt>. So it
should be gpl3+, right?
Then I looked at "flexbar". The only license-related mention in the
source code is "(GPLv3)" in the commentary of "src/Flexbar.cpp":
--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
Flexbar - flexible barcode and adapter removal
Version 2.5 (GPLv3)
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
Is it the case for 'gpl3'? Are there other cases to use 'gpl3'?
--
Alex
- gpl3 vs. gpl3+,
Alex Kost <=