[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH] xscreenshot and imagefile
|
From: |
Cyril Roelandt |
|
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH] xscreenshot and imagefile |
|
Date: |
Fri, 31 Jul 2015 00:41:50 +0200 |
|
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/31.7.0 |
On 07/30/2015 09:04 AM, Pjotr Prins wrote:
> How about creating a policy that people can refer to?
Well, I'm not sure we want to add any bureaucracy :)
Apart from that, I completely agree with your post, there is no reason
to reject xscreenshot (yet).
Cyril.
- [PATCH] xscreenshot and imagefile, Orchidaceae Phalaenopsis, 2015/07/27
- Re: [PATCH] xscreenshot and imagefile, Guix-Bot, 2015/07/28
- Re: [PATCH] xscreenshot and imagefile, Guix-Bot, 2015/07/28
- Re: [PATCH] xscreenshot and imagefile, Guix-Bot, 2015/07/28
- Re: [PATCH] xscreenshot and imagefile, Guix-Bot, 2015/07/28
- Re: [PATCH] xscreenshot and imagefile, Mark H Weaver, 2015/07/29
- Re: [PATCH] xscreenshot and imagefile, Alex Kost, 2015/07/29
- Re: [PATCH] xscreenshot and imagefile, Mark H Weaver, 2015/07/29
- Re: [PATCH] xscreenshot and imagefile, Mathieu Lirzin, 2015/07/30
- Packaging vs. Maintaining (was: [PATCH] xscreenshot and imagefile), Jeff Mickey, 2015/07/30
- Re: [PATCH] xscreenshot and imagefile, Mark H Weaver, 2015/07/30
- Re: [PATCH] xscreenshot and imagefile, Alex Kost, 2015/07/29