[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Why does glibc provide bash?
From: |
Ludovic Courtès |
Subject: |
Re: Why does glibc provide bash? |
Date: |
Tue, 18 Aug 2015 18:44:46 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux) |
Andy Wingo <address@hidden> skribis:
> I see that glibc depends on static-bash as an input, but why would
> installing glibc cause me to have a static bash in my profile?
That’s because the static bash ends up being copied in glibc’s BINDIR.
> The circular dep issue sounds pretty exciting but it seems like there
> might be another bug here. Dunno. I wonder how Nix deals with this.
Nix has /bin/sh in its default build environment, so it doesn’t have
this problem but has a bunch of other issues. ;-)
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-guix/2013-01/msg00041.html
(Now, I need to think more about the options Mark suggests.)
Ludo’.
- Why does glibc provide bash?, Andy Wingo, 2015/08/10
- Re: Why does glibc provide bash?, Mark H Weaver, 2015/08/11
- Re: Why does glibc provide bash?, Andy Wingo, 2015/08/11
- Re: Why does glibc provide bash?,
Ludovic Courtès <=
- Re: Why does glibc provide bash?, Ludovic Courtès, 2015/08/20
- Re: Why does glibc provide bash?, Ludovic Courtès, 2015/08/29
- libc upgrade vs. incompatible locales, Ludovic Courtès, 2015/08/30
- Re: libc upgrade vs. incompatible locales, Andy Wingo, 2015/08/31
- Re: libc upgrade vs. incompatible locales, Ludovic Courtès, 2015/08/31
- Re: libc upgrade vs. incompatible locales, Andy Wingo, 2015/08/31