[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: elogind status
|
From: |
宋文武 |
|
Subject: |
Re: elogind status |
|
Date: |
Fri, 21 Aug 2015 22:14:36 +0800 |
|
User-agent: |
Notmuch/0.19 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.5.1 (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu) |
Andy Wingo <address@hidden> writes:
> [...]
Great news!
> On Fri 21 Aug 2015 13:48, "Claes Wallin (韋嘉誠)" <address@hidden> writes:
>
>> How much do you know about what uselessd, nosh and the Ubuntu logind
>> shim and how they did things? I don't know anything, I just know these
>> things exist.
>
> No idea! Could be some things didn't exist back in May?
>
> Looking now:
>
> * uselessd is unmaintained, based on an old fork of systemd, actively
> hates things I don't care about, aims to replace systemd and not just
> logind
>
> * nosh: doesn't implement the login1 d-bus interface
>
> * Ubuntu logind shim: Couldn't find information about this. Ubuntu
> uses systemd now so this isn't a way forward for Guix.
AFAIK, "systemd-shim emulates the systemd function", so that Debian/Ubuntu
could run logind(from systemd) without running systemd as init. I think
it's for migration.
Also, I find another attempt 'LoginKit' from Devuan, but it suspended.
<https://github.com/dimkr/LoginKit/issues/11>
>
> I like systemd so I don't have many motivations of anti-systemd people
> :) I'm cool with DMD too, don't really care to be honest. But logind
> interfaces seem to pervade a lot of GNOME, so I'm happy to just take
> systemd's implementation and hack it into a standalone thing.
Really cool, I think we can reach GNOME soon :-)