[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: '-light' vs. '-minimal' packages
|
From: |
Alex Kost |
|
Subject: |
Re: '-light' vs. '-minimal' packages |
|
Date: |
Thu, 03 Sep 2015 11:32:48 +0300 |
|
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux) |
Ludovic Courtès (2015-09-02 23:18 +0300) wrote:
> Alex Kost <address@hidden> skribis:
[...]
>> We have ‘bash-light’ and ‘wpa-supplicant-light’; ‘bioperl-minimal’ and
>> ‘cups-minimal’. I think we should stick to a single name for such
>> light/minimal packages. (I prefer "…-minimal")
>
> Right, I realized I hadn’t made up my mind. “Minimal” is probably
> preferable, indeed. Let’s rename and bash-light in core-updates, and
> wpa-supplicant-light in master.
OK, the patches for both are attached.
0001-gnu-bash-light-Rename-to-bash-minimal.patch
Description: Text Data
0001-gnu-wpa-supplicant-light-Rename-to-wpa-supplicant-mi.patch
Description: Text Data
- Re: Installing a custom package on Guix binary setup, Ricardo Wurmus, 2015/09/01
- R dependencies, Ludovic Courtès, 2015/09/02
- '-light' vs. '-minimal' packages, Alex Kost, 2015/09/02
- Re: '-light' vs. '-minimal' packages, Mathieu Lirzin, 2015/09/02
- Re: '-light' vs. '-minimal' packages, Ludovic Courtès, 2015/09/02
- Re: '-light' vs. '-minimal' packages,
Alex Kost <=
- Re: '-light' vs. '-minimal' packages, Ludovic Courtès, 2015/09/03
- Re: '-light' vs. '-minimal' packages, Alex Kost, 2015/09/04
- Re: '-light' vs. '-minimal' packages, Ludovic Courtès, 2015/09/05
Re: R dependencies, Vicente Vera, 2015/09/02
[PATCH] R dependencies, Ricardo Wurmus, 2015/09/03