[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: New ‘guix graph’ command
From: |
Cook, Malcolm |
Subject: |
RE: New ‘guix graph’ command |
Date: |
Thu, 3 Sep 2015 20:55:46 +0000 |
Hi,
I like the request.
I think the dependent packages should be pointed to.
In this way, each node in the graph and its outgoing arrows reflect the
contents of a single package.
~Malco
> -----Original Message-----
> From: address@hidden [mailto:guix-devel-
> address@hidden On Behalf Of Ludovic Courtès
> Sent: Thursday, September 03, 2015 3:47 PM
> To: Andreas Enge <address@hidden>
> Cc: Guix-devel <address@hidden>
> Subject: Re: New ‘guix graph’ command
>
> Hey!
>
> Andreas Enge <address@hidden> skribis:
>
> > Very neat indeed! A tiny bit of nitpicking: Would it not be preferable
> > if the arrows were reversed, from the inputs to the dependent packages?
>
> Dunno, maybe the graph people would choose the other direction but I like it
> this way, looks more “intuitive” to me. What do people think?
>
> Ludo’.