Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add ruby-libxml and bioruby.

[Pjotr Prins]

On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 08:58:28AM -0400, Thompson, David wrote:
> > +    (home-page "http://bioruby.org/";)
> > +    ;; Code is released under Ruby license, except for setup
> > +    ;; (LGPLv2.1+), scripts in samples (GPL2 and GPL2+)
> > +    (license (list license:ruby license:lgpl2.1+ license:gpl2
> > +                   license:gpl2+ ))))
> 
> Wouldn't this make the collective work GPL2+?  Ludo or Mark, can you
> weigh in here?

I don't think so. 98% of the code is under the Ruby license, including
the libraries and the Ruby shell. Only a few small scripts have other
licenses. I would argue these scripts are hardly used, including setup
:)

Pj.