[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: 02/02: gnu: harfbuzz: Add "bin" output.
From: |
Ludovic Courtès |
Subject: |
Re: 02/02: gnu: harfbuzz: Add "bin" output. |
Date: |
Wed, 16 Sep 2015 22:07:52 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux) |
宋文武 <address@hidden> skribis:
> 2015-09-16 0:23 GMT+08:00 Ludovic Courtès <address@hidden>:
>> ??? <address@hidden> skribis:
>>
>>> commit eb6afbcde784a72a96f3c5a70d657630d421b02a
>>> Author: 宋文武 <address@hidden>
>>> Date: Tue Sep 15 20:19:39 2015 +0800
>>>
>>> gnu: harfbuzz: Add "bin" output.
>>>
>>> * gnu/packages/gtk.scm (harfbuzz)[outputs]: New field.
>>> [arguments]<#:configure-flags>: Pass '--bindir'.
>>
>> [...]
>>
>>> --- a/gnu/packages/gtk.scm
>>> +++ b/gnu/packages/gtk.scm
>>> @@ -154,6 +154,7 @@ affine transformation (scale, rotation, shear, etc.).")
>>> (base32
>>> "1xrxlrvgyr6mm9qjxmkif2kvcah082y94gf1vqi0f0bdl1g8gp7b"))))
>>> (build-system gnu-build-system)
>>> + (outputs '("out" "bin"))
>>
>> Could you add a comment explaining why things are split? I suppose this
>> was motivated by the size of the closure or something, no?
> Yes, I notice only the executables depend on cairo, and is about 100k of
> 700kb.
OK, makes sense. Could you make this a comment next to the ‘outputs’
field?
>> Also, adding an explicit --bindir is normally not necessary: ‘configure’
>> in gnu-build-system.scm does that when there’s a “bin” output. Or did
>> it turn out to be buggy?
> oops, I don't know this.
No problem!
Thanks,
Ludo’.