On 2015-10-22 at 10:47, quoth address@hidden:
+(define-public ghc-hscolour
+ (package
+ (name "ghc-hscolour")
I would suggest we name this package "hscolour" because it is
primarily
program or tool.
Indeed, i have renamed it.
It also has libraries; perhaps those could be put in a "lib"
output? WDYT?
Maybe i should be less lazy (surely we can forgive that in the context
of Haskell), but to be perfectly frank, i'd just love to get these
patches off my plate. Given that the Guix behaviour mirrors the Cabal
behaviour for this package (that is, it's installed, or not) i think
it's fine. But indeed i am not the most pedantic person here.
I will defer to your better judgement, but for now i've only changed
the
package name.