Re: proposal: (define (find-guix-packages list-of-names) ... )

[Florian Paul Schmidt]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

On 11/16/2015 02:03 PM, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> Florian Paul Schmidt <address@hidden> skribis:
> 
> I’m fine with documenting ‘specification->package’ as an alternate 
> option.  Its semantics are exactly the same as when referring to a 
> package by name on the command line (a warning if it’s ambiguous,
> not an error), which seems reasonable.
> 
> Thoughts?
> 

Hi again,

sure, I'm fine with just a warning, too. Thought I'd just mention the
possible problems that exist. If you want to, I can try and put
together a patch for the docs..

Regards,
Flo


- -- 
https://fps.io
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2

iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJWSi8RAAoJEA5f4Coltk8ZFNAH/Aw/7702YYsTfbie82VplpuY
s5l4KpXpwk9rBpEaZFCAPzaE4Uj39pREwg87o+5KhrpzoGaNZGs9yQI9ivQtQfN7
8W+gxfBPLdTNyqtn5RyHEOgm6RcwfnmOu5Ci7wzihproXT3tSJ6QtstFaRVUQh+e
GoWKAFh0fZQtHL6IQgix6cztoYfWxgBPnx9vctZUE1jLyITQXaF2p/eHhyJjlyB6
BYD9RZwIhAyw8DpFznhFv4Maq6YpeRb4Fo/513VAOO7cCkXbuawgVhtn8cYFY+xL
rAy8tP75Tya++7K/tL3bfKaR38PeH9WiWVKxGhYI6rzZeN2w9dyn8oUbYK1m9v8=
=2WEf
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----