guix-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: proposal: add "packagers" field (list of strings (names)) to package


From: Florian Paul Schmidt
Subject: Re: proposal: add "packagers" field (list of strings (names)) to package definition
Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2015 15:59:52 +0100
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.3.0

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

On 12/02/2015 03:09 PM, Thompson, David wrote:

>> The kind of ego-based positive feedback that having a maintainer
>> field would introduce is negative IMO.  It is good if people feel
>> attached to Guix-the-project and
>> GuixSD-the-software-distribution, and to a degree they get that
>> by copyright, git blame, and NEWS.  Feeling attached to a 
>> particular package is not as useful for the project or the
>> distribution.
> 
> +1

Aww, too bad. I think it's a missed opportunity to be inclusive and
generous with attribution which might motivate people to contribute.
Guix is in a unique position with this opportunity.

Flo

- -- 
https://fps.io
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2

iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJWXwdnAAoJEA5f4Coltk8Zx/EH/i+uevBW3FBLrBShGUYPjn6k
RqkTcAqneBc26PR8KxNboTSwxEbrtaqpSwHREtupZvRB5lV4P+2L7WKQQQe1ZlWx
oG8b7g8yO9SMprqz3sqKkLmofFlXZuodygji4acAWvbHfbqeJAhfUvqsDEHf4Ilj
rNjVZAigB8TXyIIhwRIPqUfVjgPtnT01wpa8igTma1WOfgXg9nhpAO9FeeoUmAYN
QvrnNlmQs+/DGKemSp8uzgznlRlJ4OOvHH6tFMwZMR7DS6xI0kWvW/HDmEvXswHX
mJiyZAT3GFS+2B95BL+lIP4PXwpi3gP8Y35VwvpO7qSdWgCFX/UaUgNpw8n1o7U=
=M4qg
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]