[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: armhf build machines
From: |
Andreas Enge |
Subject: |
Re: armhf build machines |
Date: |
Mon, 7 Dec 2015 11:36:46 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) |
On Mon, Dec 07, 2015 at 11:14:24AM +0200, Efraim Flashner wrote:
> The impression I got from looking at the build farm thank-yous on the website
> was that we have lowered requirements for what we're looking for in armhf
> build machines, at least in terms of RAM. In terms of freedom the Raspberry
> Pi 2 isn't great, but in terms of cost its pretty inexpensive. Is this
> something we'd be interested in?
We are waiting for two new Novena boards that should arrive before the
end of the year. The current bottleneck is not the build machines, but hydra;
already now the build farm could sustain more jobs in parallel, but we
artificially limit them. So I would say that there is currently no need
to add more build machines. This may change if we get a physical machine
for hydra.
Andreas
- armhf build machines, Efraim Flashner, 2015/12/07
- Re: armhf build machines,
Andreas Enge <=
- Re: armhf build machines, Leo Famulari, 2015/12/07
- Re: armhf build machines, Ludovic Courtès, 2015/12/07
- Re: armhf build machines, Mark H Weaver, 2015/12/07
- Re: armhf build machines, Ludovic Courtès, 2015/12/08
- Re: armhf build machines, Mark H Weaver, 2015/12/08
- Re: armhf build machines, Ludovic Courtès, 2015/12/09