[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
‘guix pull’ vs. Git
From: |
Ludovic Courtès |
Subject: |
‘guix pull’ vs. Git |
Date: |
Sat, 19 Dec 2015 15:09:23 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux) |
Mark H Weaver <address@hidden> skribis:
> Pjotr Prins <address@hidden> writes:
>
>> If it is technically feasibly it would be a great feature to go back
>> in time without resorting to using a checkout of the guix source tree
>> :)
>
> I'm not sure why using a git checkout should be considered an
> unfortunate thing to have to resort to. To my mind, it is precisely the
> right tool for the job, and far more flexible and efficient than using
> "guix pull". It is the way I've been using 'guix' from the beginning.
> I recommend giving it a try some time :)
I think Git is the right tool, but the wrong UI. :-) Not to mention
./pre-inst-env.
Ideally, ‘guix pull’ would do exactly the same as what one does with
Git, except in a more automated, user-friendly, and bullet-proof fashion
(no need to wonder about ABI breakage, for instance.)
WDYT?
Ludo’.
Re: guixsd offline installation media, Ludovic Courtès, 2015/12/17