[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Moving to beta? When?
From: |
anonymiss |
Subject: |
Re: Moving to beta? When? |
Date: |
Sun, 20 Dec 2015 11:47:23 +0100 |
> On Sun, 20 Dec 2015 10:08:26 +0200
> Efraim Flashner <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> On Fri, 18 Dec 2015 19:40:29 -0600
> Christopher Allan Webber <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> > Hello all,
> >
> > Guix is super stable for me these days. In a sense, more stable
> > than any other system I've ever run. We also are quickly moving to
> > the point where *most* core packages people need are there.
> >
> > I think the Alpha label is too conservative. Once gnome-shell
> > lands, or once the next release comes out, what do people think
> > about Beta?
>
> I was going to save it for a 0.10 vs 1.0 debate, but here makes sense
> also :) I think it also comes down to what are we missing? Not
> necessarily for beta, but more as a list between "here" and "1.0
> worthy."
>
> gnome(-shell) and kde: I think many people would expect these
I know some people who would expect a working full disk encryption
with whatever they use, including myself.
>
> installer: I haven't looked at the gentoo or archlinux installer
> recently, but ours looks similar in terms of "here's a shell, go
> ahead and bootstrap it." Also we have some lingering issues
> like /home on a different partition, actually partitioning and
> formatting the device, and maybe more.
I don't know about archlinux anymore, last time I tried it was even
more simplified then I remembered (partition, bootstrap, other stuff,
done), and Gentoo is also pretty forward (partly because the
documentation is very good and leaves no questions at all.
>
> guix pull: super slow as-is :) going back to the gentoo comparison,
> iirc gentoo rsyncs the svn repo, and we all know how fast `git pull
> && make` is.
>
> anything else?
>
> > That still sounds like "not quite production ready for everyone" but
> > Alpha hardly feels fair to Guix anymore. (The most alpha thing
> > about GuixSD thing at this point is the install process, and hey,
> > it's like going oldschool with my install again.... :))
> >
> > Or, when to switch?
> > - Chris
> >
>
> On the other side, gnome-shell sounds like a good cut-off for beta.
>
--
--
NG. / anonymiss
http://libertad.pw http://krosos.sdf.org
gopher://sdf.org/1/users/krosos
Email is public. Talk to me in private:
https://psyced.org:34443/~anonymiss
privacy respecting, secure communication:
BM-2cSj8qEigE3CMaLU3CwPZf7T3LvzvnttsC
(bitmessage)