[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH] Add package definition for GNU XaoS.
From: |
Alex Kost |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH] Add package definition for GNU XaoS. |
Date: |
Mon, 21 Dec 2015 15:42:33 +0300 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux) |
Andreas Enge (2015-12-16 04:48 +0300) wrote:
> Maybe it would make sense to kindly remind them to put their releases
> on ftp.gnu.org. That would also allow us to be notified of updates
> (which could be used as an argument).
I was going to commit this patch but now I don't know: should we wait
for a reply from the maintainers about updating xaos release on gnu.org?
Or maybe push this patch now, and change the origin URL later (if there
will be a response)?
Fabian Harfert (2015-12-15 23:02 +0300) wrote:
[...]
> From 6687ea7c21725bdc13e368773d5c7576a43db14e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Fabian Harfert <address@hidden>
> Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2015 21:00:38 +0100
> Subject: [PATCH] Add package definition for GNU XaoS.
Our convention is to use the following commit message:
--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
gnu: Add xaos.
* gnu/packages/maths.scm (xaos): New variable.
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
> ---
> gnu/packages/maths.scm | 31 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 31 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/gnu/packages/maths.scm b/gnu/packages/maths.scm
> index 0c0f013..181809c 100644
> --- a/gnu/packages/maths.scm
> +++ b/gnu/packages/maths.scm
> @@ -9,6 +9,7 @@
> ;;; Copyright © 2015 Sou Bunnbu <address@hidden>
> ;;; Copyright © 2015 Mark H Weaver <address@hidden>
> ;;; Copyright © 2015 Efraim Flashner <address@hidden>
> +;;; Copyright © 2015 Fabian Harfert <address@hidden>
> ;;;
> ;;; This file is part of GNU Guix.
> ;;;
> @@ -53,6 +54,7 @@
> #:use-module (gnu packages ghostscript)
> #:use-module (gnu packages glib)
> #:use-module (gnu packages gtk)
> + #:use-module (gnu packages image)
Our (gnu packages image) module uses (gnu packages maths). I wouldn't
add this circularity, I think it was better to have xaos in a separate
module. But actually I don't know if it's a real issue and what our
policy on such things is. I hope more experienced guix/guile people
will tell if we should avoid such circularities.
--
Alex