guix-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH] gtk+: Support GUIX_GTK{2,3}_PATH variables.


From: Ricardo Wurmus
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gtk+: Support GUIX_GTK{2,3}_PATH variables.
Date: Fri, 25 Dec 2015 12:16:15 +0100
User-agent: mu4e 0.9.13; emacs 24.5.1

Ludovic Courtès <address@hidden> writes:

> Ricardo Wurmus <address@hidden> skribis:
>
>> Ludovic Courtès <address@hidden> writes:
>>
>>> Ricardo Wurmus <address@hidden> skribis:
>>>
>>>> From 11f502281064525a067c1453cd2b7b663bf6c3bb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>>>> From: Ricardo Wurmus <address@hidden>
>>>> Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2015 08:32:06 +0100
>>>> Subject: [PATCH 2/3] gnu: gtk+: Add patch to support GUIX_GTK3_PATH.
>>>>
>>>> * gnu/packages/patches/gtk3-respect-GUIX_GTK3_PATH: New file.
>>>> * gnu-system.am (dist_patch_DATA): Add it.
>>>> * gnu/packages/gtk.scm (gtk+) [source]: Add patch.
>>>> [native-search-paths]: Add search path for GUIX_GTK3_PATH.
>>>
>>> LGTM.
>>>
>>> This will have to go to a separate branch.  We’ll get Hydra to build it
>>> once it’s done with the security updates.
>>
>> Could you push them to a new branch then?  I have no control over what
>> Hydra builds and I assume you’d want to rebase them on top of the
>> security updates.
>
> Here’s the deal: If you push a new branch based on current master, I’ll
> make sure Hydra builds it.  :-)

I rebased the patches on top of current master and pushed them to a
new branch “gtk-path-patch”.

>>> I agree with Andy that this needs to be discussed with upstream though.
>>> Could you open a bug on their tracker and explain the problem and
>>> proposed solution?
>>
>> Yes, I’ll take care of this.

My email to address@hidden is still awaiting moderation :-/
Maybe I should try again after subscribing.

~~ Ricardo




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]