guix-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH] Replace broken LADSPA URL.


From: Alex Vong
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Replace broken LADSPA URL.
Date: Tue, 29 Dec 2015 21:15:33 +0800
User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux)

Ricardo Wurmus <address@hidden> writes:

> Alex Vong <address@hidden> writes:
>
>> From 2feefc6fd7162d7226015aa296ace0c8e7d034bf Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>> From: Alex Vong <address@hidden>
>> Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2015 01:19:44 +0800
>> Subject: [PATCH] gnu: ladspa: Update urls.
>>
>> * gnu/packages/audio.scm (ladspa): Update source and home page url.
>>
>> Thanks to Ricardo Wurmus for suggesting downloading the source
>> from Internet Archive.
>
> Thanks, but attribution is not required here :)
>
OK...

>>  gnu/packages/audio.scm | 29 +++++++++++++++++++----------
>>  1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/gnu/packages/audio.scm b/gnu/packages/audio.scm
>> index 6a8347a..9f3c217 100644
>> --- a/gnu/packages/audio.scm
>> +++ b/gnu/packages/audio.scm
>> @@ -817,15 +817,22 @@ plugin function as a JACK application.")
>>    (package
>>      (name "ladspa")
>>      (version "1.13")
>> -    (source (origin
>> -             (method url-fetch)
>> -             (uri (string-append
>> -                   "http://www.ladspa.org/download/ladspa_sdk_";
>> -                   version
>> -                   ".tgz"))
>> -             (sha256
>> -              (base32
>> -               "0srh5n2l63354bc0srcrv58rzjkn4gv8qjqzg8dnq3rs4m7kzvdm"))))
>> +    (source
>> +     (origin
>> +       (method url-fetch)
>> +       ;; Since the official link is dead,
>> +       ;; we download the tarball from Debian or Internet Archive.
>> +       (uri (list (string-append "http://http.debian.net";
>> +                                 
>> "/debian/pool/main/l/ladspa-sdk/ladspa-sdk_"
>> +                                 version
>> +                                 ".orig.tar.gz")
>
> My preference is to keep “version” and the following string on the same
> line because they are both short.
>
Is it a lisp / scheme convention to do this? I always think I should
call a function like this:
(func arg1 arg2 ...)
or
(func arg1
      arg2
      ...)

>> + (string-append "https://web.archive.org/web/20140717172251/";
>> +                                 
>> "http://www.ladspa.org/download/ladspa_sdk_";
>> +                                 version
>> +                                 ".tgz")))
>
> Same here.  (It’s just a nitpick.)
>
>> +       (sha256
>> +        (base32
>> +         "0srh5n2l63354bc0srcrv58rzjkn4gv8qjqzg8dnq3rs4m7kzvdm"))))
>>      (build-system gnu-build-system)
>>      (arguments
>>       `(#:tests? #f  ; the "test" target is a listening test only
>> @@ -843,7 +850,9 @@ plugin function as a JACK application.")
>>                (("^CC.*")            "CC = gcc\n")
>>                (("^CPP.*")           "CPP = g++\n"))))
>>          (alist-delete 'build %standard-phases))))
>> -    (home-page "http://ladspa.org";)
>> +    ;; Since the home page is gone, we provide a link to the archived 
>> version.
>> +    (home-page
>> +     "https://web.archive.org/web/20140729190945/http://www.ladspa.org/";)
>>      (synopsis "Linux Audio Developer's Simple Plugin API (LADSPA)")
>>      (description
>>       "LADSPA is a standard that allows software audio processors and effects
>
> Do you have permission to push or should I apply this on your behalf?
>
No, I don't have push right. I am more of a user-programmer right now :)

> ~~ Ricardo



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]