guix-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH] gtk+: Support GUIX_GTK{2,3}_PATH variables.


From: Ludovic Courtès
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gtk+: Support GUIX_GTK{2,3}_PATH variables.
Date: Wed, 30 Dec 2015 17:20:18 +0100
User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux)

Mark H Weaver <address@hidden> skribis:

> Mark H Weaver <address@hidden> writes:
>
>> Ricardo Wurmus <address@hidden> writes:
>>
>>> Ludovic Courtès <address@hidden> writes:
>>>
>>>> Ricardo Wurmus <address@hidden> skribis:
>>>>
>>>>> Ludovic Courtès <address@hidden> writes:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Ricardo Wurmus <address@hidden> skribis:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> From 11f502281064525a067c1453cd2b7b663bf6c3bb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>>>>>>> From: Ricardo Wurmus <address@hidden>
>>>>>>> Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2015 08:32:06 +0100
>>>>>>> Subject: [PATCH 2/3] gnu: gtk+: Add patch to support GUIX_GTK3_PATH.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> * gnu/packages/patches/gtk3-respect-GUIX_GTK3_PATH: New file.
>>>>>>> * gnu-system.am (dist_patch_DATA): Add it.
>>>>>>> * gnu/packages/gtk.scm (gtk+) [source]: Add patch.
>>>>>>> [native-search-paths]: Add search path for GUIX_GTK3_PATH.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> LGTM.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This will have to go to a separate branch.  We’ll get Hydra to build it
>>>>>> once it’s done with the security updates.
>>>>>
>>>>> Could you push them to a new branch then?  I have no control over what
>>>>> Hydra builds and I assume you’d want to rebase them on top of the
>>>>> security updates.
>>>>
>>>> Here’s the deal: If you push a new branch based on current master, I’ll
>>>> make sure Hydra builds it.  :-)
>>>
>>> I rebased the patches on top of current master and pushed them to a
>>> new branch “gtk-path-patch”.
>>
>> I just rebased them again, and started Hydra building the branch.
>>
>> http://hydra.gnu.org/jobset/gnu/gtk-path-patch
>
> This is now sufficiently built to merge to 'master', but I'm not sure
> whether it was decided to do this before getting feedback from upstream.

I think there was consensus that this is OK to install the patch for our
purposes, and that we can always adjust should upstream propose
something different.

Ricardo?

Thanks,
Ludo’.



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]