[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH] gtk+: Support GUIX_GTK{2,3}_PATH variables.
From: |
Ludovic Courtès |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH] gtk+: Support GUIX_GTK{2,3}_PATH variables. |
Date: |
Wed, 30 Dec 2015 17:20:18 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux) |
Mark H Weaver <address@hidden> skribis:
> Mark H Weaver <address@hidden> writes:
>
>> Ricardo Wurmus <address@hidden> writes:
>>
>>> Ludovic Courtès <address@hidden> writes:
>>>
>>>> Ricardo Wurmus <address@hidden> skribis:
>>>>
>>>>> Ludovic Courtès <address@hidden> writes:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Ricardo Wurmus <address@hidden> skribis:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> From 11f502281064525a067c1453cd2b7b663bf6c3bb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>>>>>>> From: Ricardo Wurmus <address@hidden>
>>>>>>> Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2015 08:32:06 +0100
>>>>>>> Subject: [PATCH 2/3] gnu: gtk+: Add patch to support GUIX_GTK3_PATH.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> * gnu/packages/patches/gtk3-respect-GUIX_GTK3_PATH: New file.
>>>>>>> * gnu-system.am (dist_patch_DATA): Add it.
>>>>>>> * gnu/packages/gtk.scm (gtk+) [source]: Add patch.
>>>>>>> [native-search-paths]: Add search path for GUIX_GTK3_PATH.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> LGTM.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This will have to go to a separate branch. We’ll get Hydra to build it
>>>>>> once it’s done with the security updates.
>>>>>
>>>>> Could you push them to a new branch then? I have no control over what
>>>>> Hydra builds and I assume you’d want to rebase them on top of the
>>>>> security updates.
>>>>
>>>> Here’s the deal: If you push a new branch based on current master, I’ll
>>>> make sure Hydra builds it. :-)
>>>
>>> I rebased the patches on top of current master and pushed them to a
>>> new branch “gtk-path-patch”.
>>
>> I just rebased them again, and started Hydra building the branch.
>>
>> http://hydra.gnu.org/jobset/gnu/gtk-path-patch
>
> This is now sufficiently built to merge to 'master', but I'm not sure
> whether it was decided to do this before getting feedback from upstream.
I think there was consensus that this is OK to install the patch for our
purposes, and that we can always adjust should upstream propose
something different.
Ricardo?
Thanks,
Ludo’.
- [PATCH] gtk+: Support GUIX_GTK{2,3}_PATH variables., Ricardo Wurmus, 2015/12/03
- Re: [PATCH] gtk+: Support GUIX_GTK{2,3}_PATH variables., Andy Wingo, 2015/12/03
- Re: [PATCH] gtk+: Support GUIX_GTK{2,3}_PATH variables., Ricardo Wurmus, 2015/12/03
- Re: [PATCH] gtk+: Support GUIX_GTK{2,3}_PATH variables., Andy Wingo, 2015/12/04
- Re: [PATCH] gtk+: Support GUIX_GTK{2,3}_PATH variables., Ludovic Courtès, 2015/12/04
- Re: [PATCH] gtk+: Support GUIX_GTK{2,3}_PATH variables., Ricardo Wurmus, 2015/12/08
- Re: [PATCH] gtk+: Support GUIX_GTK{2,3}_PATH variables., Ludovic Courtès, 2015/12/09
- Re: [PATCH] gtk+: Support GUIX_GTK{2,3}_PATH variables., Ricardo Wurmus, 2015/12/25
- Re: [PATCH] gtk+: Support GUIX_GTK{2,3}_PATH variables., Mark H Weaver, 2015/12/28
- Re: [PATCH] gtk+: Support GUIX_GTK{2,3}_PATH variables., Mark H Weaver, 2015/12/29
- Re: [PATCH] gtk+: Support GUIX_GTK{2,3}_PATH variables.,
Ludovic Courtès <=
- Re: [PATCH] gtk+: Support GUIX_GTK{2,3}_PATH variables., Ricardo Wurmus, 2015/12/31