[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: New CLI syntax for package version
|
From: |
Ludovic Courtès |
|
Subject: |
Re: New CLI syntax for package version |
|
Date: |
Mon, 11 Jan 2016 21:51:46 +0100 |
|
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux) |
address@hidden skribis:
> The problem I see with 3. is that the mailing list archives will detect the
> package names (with versions, ie the whole strings like address@hidden) as
> email
> addresses, and hide them, by replacing them with address@hidden As an
> example, here’s the mail I replied to:
>
> https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2016-01/msg00343.html
True… Gmane does something slightly less silly:
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gnu.guix.devel/15058
Ludo’.
- Re: Version numbers for VCS snapshots, (continued)
- Re: Version numbers for VCS snapshots, Eric Bavier, 2016/01/21
- Re: Version numbers for VCS snapshots, Jookia, 2016/01/21
- Re: Version numbers for VCS snapshots, Andy Wingo, 2016/01/22
- Re: Version numbers for VCS snapshots, Ricardo Wurmus, 2016/01/22
- Re: Version numbers for VCS snapshots, Ludovic Courtès, 2016/01/23
Re: New CLI syntax for package version, Federico Beffa, 2016/01/09